COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — International Points

by Anup Shah
This web page Created Saturday, January 24, 2015

This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/article/805/cop20-lima-climate-conference.
To print all data (e.g. expanded aspect notes, exhibits various hyperlinks), use the print model:

On this web page:

Introduction
Assembly consequence
Mainstream media reporting
In context: frequent however differentiated tasks
Extra data
Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also called the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to prime

Assembly consequence

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse fuel emissions. Often called the Lima Accord, this treaty isn’t legally binding and international locations don’t have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as an alternative agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it gave the impression of a profitable consequence, others have been dissatisfied, resembling poor international locations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and harm commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful facets of the assembly consequence, noting

The brand new settlement doesn’t mirror the urgency of the local weather disaster
Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
Least developed and susceptible nations overlooked within the chilly
Divestment (from fossil gasoline reliance) is extra necessary than ever
International momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In attempting to place a constructive spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, In the long run, a worldwide local weather treaty is only one software to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to return from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s international locations comes collectively to debate this disaster and individuals are placing in monumental efforts to verify Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was stuffed with disappointments regardless of huge guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s International Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly consequence saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to clarify how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of probably the most susceptible international locations, they fully eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and harm’.

Again to prime

Mainstream media reporting

As with nearly each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this world concern. The place the assembly was reported it was usually in direction of the tip, and simply sound chew kind summaries saying all international locations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a significant enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing frequent however differentiated tasks the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has usually failed to supply rationalization and context of this precept that has been an necessary a part of these talks for over 2 a long time; that poor and creating international locations shouldn’t bear the identical tasks because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier a long time which have led to this, which is detailed way more on this web site’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept could have been introduced as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, reasonably then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from frequent reporting. Others included points on financing, expertise assist for poorer nations, and many others. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy international locations have stalled on this stuff or actively prevented attempting to share expertise and many others, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is manufactured from mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations annually, it may be simple to return away with the impression that this assembly had a constructive consequence.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! exhibits, there have been quite a few necessary problems with competition:

Emissions-Reducing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to prime

In context: frequent however differentiated tasks

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from at the moment’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse fuel — stays within the ambiance for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling probably the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would subsequently be totally different for these teams of nations — the frequent however differentiated tasks precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to eliminate .

The years of resistance on this concern (and plenty of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the shortage of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions lately, in comparison with the far better quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this web site’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this web site has mentioned for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s finally — and disproportionately — paid for the by the creating nations. New Delhi primarily based Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Normal, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There isn’t a motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be finished by the developed international locations. They [rich nations] mainly have simply mentioned at Lima that we aren’t going to do any greater than what we’re doing to this point, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different creating international locations need to share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in dangerous religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Reducing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to prime