One factor concerning the brutal world of meth dealing on “Breaking Dangerous” is that there was by no means any assure a personality would survive. Sequence creator/showrunner Vince Gilligan and the writing staff considered killing off main characters fairly often, like famously initially planning on killing Jesse (Aaron Paul) on the finish of season 1 or considering killing Sklyer (Anna Gunn) in season 5. The present would have been very completely different with out Jesse, who’s the true coronary heart and soul of the sequence, so killing him would have been an enormous mistake, and killing Skyler would have simply been pointless. Fortunately, the writing staff made the fitting selection in the long run and saved each characters from the chopping block.
Whereas engaged on the ultimate season and getting the massive finale all found out, there was one other character that nearly ended up six toes below: Saul Goodman, performed by Bob Odenkirk. Saul is likely one of the present’s greatest characters and even bought his personal prequel sequence, “Higher Name Saul,” so killing him off would have had main repercussions. It actually would have upset a variety of the fandom on high of impacting “Higher Name Saul,” so it is nice that he was saved, however why did Gilligan even take into consideration killing him within the first place?
In a 2014 interview with Leisure Weekly, Gilligan defined why he virtually killed Saul and determined to pivot to simply killing Walt (Bryan Cranston) as a substitute, and it is fascinating to consider simply how completely different “Breaking Dangerous” and “Higher Name Saul” may need been.
The Breaking Dangerous finale virtually killed Saul
The “Breaking Dangerous” writing staff went backwards and forwards on whether or not or not they wished to exit in a “massacre” or do one thing a bit extra restrained. Gilligan even stated that at one level, “we talked about killing off each main character” in a “‘Wild Bunch’ massacre of an ending.” They finally determined to again off a bit as a result of they realized that despite the fact that that ending can be dramatic, it would not essentially serve the story. And with Saul, they realized that it would not actually make sense for his character. As Gilligan defined:
“Saul Goodman is type of like a cockroach, within the sense that he is most likely going to outlive all nuclear wars and he’ll nonetheless be on the market someplace after mankind has turn into extinct. He is a survivor and subsequently it might be bizarre if he did not survive. Walter White, however, bought a demise sentence within the first act of the very first episode. It might be lower than satisfying maybe if he did not die on the finish of the entire thing.”
It was completely very important that Walt died on the finish of the sequence to finish Walt’s arc, even when the chemistry-teacher-turned-meth-kingpin’s demise was the one second that made Gilligan cry. However when it got here to Saul, there have been some fairly huge components moreover his cockroach-like means to outlive almost something.
No good cause to kill Saul Goodman
Gilligan admitted that whereas the affect killing Saul would have on “Higher Name Saul” was “most likely an element” of their choice to maintain him alive, the larger drawback was that they only could not give you a very good cause or method to kill him. There simply wasn’t that magical second once they all felt like they’d settled on the right method to take out Saul that will have that means and be narratively satisfying, so he figured, “Why trouble?”
He additionally identified that their involvement in “Higher Name Saul” did not imply a personality would survive “Breaking Dangerous,” in fact, as Mike (Jonathan Banks) had a significant position within the prequel sequence regardless of being killed off “despatched to Belize” within the killer season 5 episode “Say My Title.” Characters weave all through “Breaking Dangerous,” “Higher Name Saul,” and the sequel movie “El Camino,” with fairly a couple of dying onscreen in “Breaking Dangerous” lengthy earlier than showing in “Higher Name Saul.” (Should you’re confused on the timelines, don’t fret, we have a primer on that.)
I am glad that they did not kill off Saul as a result of it will have forged a gloom over “Higher Name Saul” that will have been arduous to disregard, and that sequence is actually unimaginable. And like Gilligan stated, Saul’s a survivor, a cockroach, the type of man that simply would not go down due to Walter White.