What, precisely, does a Director of Cognitive Benefit do? It’s not a title most People encounter, and it sits far exterior the acquainted contours of diplomacy, navy drive, or financial leverage. However as Chenoweth explains, the competition for affect not stays neatly inside these lanes both.
His focus is usually on the grey area – the place data, notion, tradition, and conduct collide, and the place adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are working with staggering sources and strategic focus.
On this Cipher Transient dialog, Chenoweth breaks down how cognitive operations really work, why the U.S. has struggled to maintain tempo, and what it means to offer the President an “data choice” that’s not merely kinetic or financial.
He provides uncommon, candid perception into how know-how, AI, and social platforms—from TikTok to algorithmically pushed personas—are reshaping the battlespace sooner than policymakers can write doctrine.
Our dialog is a deep dive into one of many least understood – however maybe most consequential – fronts of contemporary nationwide safety. Our dialog has been calmly edited for size and readability.
Shawn Chenoweth
Shawn Chenoweth is the Director of Cognitive Benefit on the US Nationwide Safety Council.
The Cipher Transient: How do you clarify the position of the director of Cognitive Benefit?
Chenoweth: If you take a look at conventional parts of navy energy, you in all probability consider the DIME assemble. It is not an ideal assemble, however it’s fairly good. DIME, is damaged down into Diplomatic, Data, Navy and Financial, and it’s totally clear who owns the Diplomatic, Navy, and Financial parts. However there hasn’t been, a minimum of in a number of a long time, instance of the place individuals have actually come to the president and the administration with an “I” choice, for Data. And it is a disgrace as a result of if you really take a look at the DIME assemble, you do not wish to break it into range pipes. We should always consider it as a cell. Every of these parts acts as a part of a functioning cell, and eradicating any of these parts means you will have an imperfect or failing cell.
So, I used to be requested to assist put the “I” again in DIME in order that we are able to present further choices and benefits throughout the opposite parts of DIME to nationwide energy and supply the president with alternatives to perform the Administration’s targets that are not simply warheads on foreheads or threatening economics or expending political leverage. We will improve these issues, however we are able to additionally acquire benefits through the use of cognitive results via the knowledge atmosphere.
Kelly: Let’s set the stage a bit additional. Should you had been to elucidate to the common American what is going on by way of cognitive warfare within the grey zone – the realm the place battle happens under the extent of warfare – how would you describe it?
Chenoweth: I believe when you look via your navy histories, philosophers, politicians, political science, it is all fairly clear. You possibly can pick the weather. All of them have one underlying thread, which is that political victory is the one which issues at its core. That is actually what we’re speaking about. Nothing’s modified. How human beings are related, how know-how is affected has definitely modified. However what we actually care about is what individuals do in the true world and the geophysical world, the world we stay in.
So, the purpose of a cognitive benefit is to leverage that in order that human beings are taking behaviors favorable to outcomes, to nationwide targets, which more often than not are additionally – within the case of the US – favorable in their very own proper. So it is core. And that’s what we’re driving to get: these benefits in what individuals do in the true world via their sensing, to make choices that come again to the true world and have the results that you really want.
Kelly: Are you able to give an instance of what that might appear like?
Chenoweth: For instance you are negotiating for a bit of land or a base that you simply want for overflight intel assortment. You are going to conduct a trade-off in negotiations. Perhaps it is going to appear like, – when you pay extra, you may get extra – primarily based off what the worth proposition is. However very hardly ever is it that blatant and easy. So, what you need to have the ability to do is perceive, what benefit would we want within the negotiation? What’s really driving this different social gathering aside from possibly simply price or simply hazard? What’s the danger calculus?
There are cultural nuances that have an effect on issues: their understanding of affect, political implications. So, the purpose can be to know why they’d have an interest on this within the first place? What benefit does it give them? What are the cultural nuances? Why would not they do that within the first place? Why aren’t they taking this motion and what can we do to be sure that the result is what we would like?
There are different areas the place that applies throughout the spectrum.
For instance we’re conducting counter-terrorism operations, and we all know an goal tends to make use of a specific cafe. Nicely, what in the event that they had been utilizing a distinct one which day? What can we do to affect them to go to a spot that is extra favorable for choices to lower our personal threat calculus, both as a result of we wish to conduct a kinetic strike or make an arrest? Perhaps we will not discover them. So, what if we use that for our intel assortment and our strategies to principally make them come up on comms and alter their conduct so it is simpler to seek out them, gather on them, and construct the info in order that we are able to conduct bodily actions to cease or disrupt them? And you may sort of see how that applies throughout the board.
If you understand greater than the particular person you are coping with, likelihood is that you’ll be higher at carrying out your consequence. It’s very comparable with the werewolf principle. It is a sport the place two persons are chosen to be the werewolf of the village and everybody else within the group would not know who the werewolf is. More often than not the people who find themselves the werewolves win the sport as a result of they’ve an data benefit over everybody else taking part in the sport. So, it is a human norm.
And once more, I level out that nothing’s new below the solar. It is simply that we have not actually thought via the implications of what it means within the data age that we stay in – the place everyone seems to be related via software program outlined radios. We’re a good distance away from direct sensing the place it is communication and issues occurring in the true world. Now we’ve type of oblique sensing the place you are fed information feeds and every little thing else. We will have an effect on cognitive conduct in methods we by no means imagined, and we actually have not thought via simply as we are able to attain individuals and promote objects. And if I wish to discover an individual whose favourite shade is pink, who’s a navy age male who’s actually into Magnum PI, I can discover that particular person because of their radio, and I can craft messages particularly for somebody who matches that demographic and transfer them in a specific path. That is the primary time in historical past that that is been the case.
Kelly: You might have a background that mixes each authorities and personal sector expertise. On condition that know-how is being quickly developed within the non-public sector, how do you suppose that background offers you a bonus on this position?
Chenoweth: There are lots of people who’ve served within the navy and have been contractors however simply by happenstance, I occur to have been in quite a lot of important areas at important instances. I believe one of many benefits that has introduced me is that I noticed the frustration inside the navy when the contracting equipment did not work. I used to be additionally empowered by business to go and repair quite a lot of these buildings and allow the federal government to do it, and now I am getting afforded the chance to work on coverage to make the system actually hum.
I believe the benefit with that’s that with regards to the knowledge area, there is not any management. And I attempt to emphasize this to any coverage maker or energy dealer or choice maker that I can discover. You possibly can put an armored brigade in an intersection – totally outfitted, totally supported – and a U.S. Armored Brigade may personal that intersection. There are issues you may management. However with regards to the knowledge area, there isn’t any management. It’s continuously shifting, continuously altering. You might have a binary choice. You’re both going to take part, ideally at a degree that issues, or not, and no matter’s going to occur goes to occur.
So, you can end up in an advantageous data area within the morning, lose it by the late morning, get a stalemate within the afternoon, and win it again within the afternoon – simply to lose it once more on the finish of the day. And if you get up the subsequent morning, you are going to must do it yet again. There isn’t any, “We now have data dominance and we’re accomplished and we are able to crack our beers and go on with different issues.”
That is not how this works as a result of every single day new data is being injected into the system. Persons are altering and creating new opinions. Issues are occurring and persons are going to react to these issues, change their opinions, adapt, age out, age in, so these cultural references could change. It is a fixed flux. One of many issues that from the U.S. authorities aspect we’re getting our head round is that we want an data service group continuously working afloat within the data atmosphere, successfully. One which’s engaged 24/7 to have an effect on these adjustments.
The Cipher Transient is partnering with the Data Professionals Affiliation and the Nationwide Heart for Narrative Intelligence to carry you Pinnacle 2026: Grey Zone Convergence: Cognitive Safety on the Intersection of Affect, Innovation, and Shared Pursuits. Register for the February 9-10 convention now to safe your spot.
Kelly: It is not simply the US that has gotten fairly good at understanding the influence of cognitive benefit. We see these techniques from China and Russia getting used with gorgeous success. On this position, how targeted are you on their actions with regards to doing the very same factor that you simply’re tasked with doing?
Chenoweth: They completely follow these actions. I name them the ‘CRINKETT’. Each problem we’re typically coping with falls within the CRINKETTS. It is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Terrorists and Trans[national] criminals. And significantly for the nation states, that is precisely how they wish to compete.
From their perspective, there are two methods to take care of the US: asymmetrically and stupidly, largely due to our financial and navy energy. They get that. They are not desirous about a kinetic combat; that’s an terrible prospect. So the way in which they wish to do that is in grey zone actions, within the data area, within the cognitive area.
They usually outspend us. I am not going to say essentially outperform, however I will say if you wish to compete at a degree that issues, they outspend us, interval. Iran in all probability spends round $1.8 billion plus-minus a yr, possibly extra with their proxies and every little thing else they do on this specific area. Russia – publish Ukraine invasion, spends about $2.6 billion, one thing like that. China – 48 plus billion {dollars} a yr. The U.S., if I take all the actions from the DoD, the State Division and every little thing else, and you place these collectively, you would possibly strategy $1.2 billion.
It does not imply we’re executing these funds both. It simply implies that that is what we have allotted. When you consider how we outspend to have a bonus on the opposite elements of DIME, we’re hideously underperforming right here. And once more, all props to the administration. They’re aware of this and the help I’ve had on the Nationwide Safety Council and throughout the weather of presidency – the departments and businesses – has been stellar. And we’ll proceed to work on this and get it proper as a result of we’ve three and a half extra years of President Trump’s administration to get this proper, do the reps and units, and make this a sturdy coverage in order that the American individuals can begin having fun with these advantages that come once we’re actually targeted on this area.
Kelly: What does success appear like for you on this position and the way do you measure it?
Chenoweth: Measurement has all the time been a humorous factor. Folks will continuously inform me how exhausting it’s to measure these actions. And what I’ve discovered time and time once more is that we’re really fairly good at these actions. The problems with the measurements are, once more, taking part at a scale that issues. We have to measure conduct change, and as a way to try this, we have to have clear targets. What are we after?
The large a part of that’s who’s the target market that has the company to do the factor we would like? We spend quite a lot of time planning and CONOPS [Concept of Operations] on sub-target audiences that do not even have the company – in hopes that they have an effect on company – and that is completely effective. However why are we doing assessments towards this? We spend quite a lot of money and time producing assessments to focus on audiences that do not have the company you need. So, let’s deal with the target market that has the company and let’s do that at scale.
For instance; I am within the DC space and I can go all the way down to the Potomac River, drop a bucket of water within the river, and I’ve objectively molecularly elevated the quantity of water within the Potomac. There is not a sensor on this planet that’s going to detect that molecular change.
The very fact is that you simply could be having an impact, however you do not have a sensor that’s going to choose that up. So, you must improve your scale or customise your sensing system to the impact you are having. That tends to be the place the assessments crumble.
I’ve heard on a regular basis for many years now that assessments are so exhausting. I do not discover that to be true. What I discover is that you have sacrificed assessments for impact, which is okay. It is threat calculus. If I had a low quantity of sources and I made a decision to place as a lot into the impact I’ve wished, that is effective. However on the finish of the day, you are on the lookout for the true conduct change within the focused viewers that issues. What are the sensors you will have on that and what are you doing to gather that information: public opinion, analysis surveys, constructing the networks. We’ll see this exacerbate additional because the AI revolution continues at tempo.
Kelly: How is know-how impacting what you are making an attempt to do, your mission, after which how are you additionally working with the non-public sector as a result of the non-public sector is controlling a lot of the know-how and the innovation that the federal government must work with. So how are you doing that?
Chenoweth: One of many challenges I see rising from AI is that there is type of an assumption that AI will repair all of your woes. I’ve seen the perfect instruments on the market do one factor: they mannequin the info they’ve, and that is the core problem. We do not have the info. So once more, I am again to there’s not a complete lot of recent issues below the solar. And the AI fashions are actually good, and it may well let you discover new insights from the info that you’ve, however new information must be created. So, sacrificing assortment methodologies and new approaches to assemble the info on the foot of a mannequin is horrible.
The AI snake oil salesman I’d take care of in business on a regular basis would are available in and say, ‘Oh, you are desirous about that? I may completely mannequin you the factor.’ Cool. How does that work? ‘Nicely, all it’s important to do is present me the info and we’ll put all this collectively and provide the insights.’ I am like, whoa. We do not have the info both. Nobody has the info. That is sort of the issue. So, let’s be sincere about what we’re doing.
AI goes to be a fantastic boon for business and for the federal government and everybody else below the solar. It should clearly have influence, however I believe as that strikes ahead, we have to begin taking a look at how we really make use of it. Constructing an agent or a token for each employee so that they are augmented by an AI that does the factor that they themselves might not be good at or saving them time goes to be wonderful, however it must be undergirded by having the ability to detect what’s really occurring out in the true world. And people two issues will not be essentially – not interrelated. As I stated, most issues are sort of an entire cell that function in a single unit, and we will not essentially bifurcate these items after which count on good outcomes.
Former Senior CIA Government Dave Pitts wrote a three-part collection completely for The Cipher Transient on what the U.S. can do to develop into extra aggressive within the Grey Zone. Subscriber+Members can learn it right here. Want entry? We may also help with that.
Kelly: So you will have a mission that’s tough to measure, is massively impactful, adversaries are utilizing it as effectively towards Americans successfully, and in some circumstances, these adversaires are dedicating much more sources to this. Should you may explaine to the common U.S. citizen how they could be focused by cognitive operations which can be carried out by U.S. adversaries, what would you inform them to search for?
Chenoweth: It’s essential be conscious of sources clearly. After I take a look at the assemble of how we strategy cognitive warfare, I believe one of many largest issues I’ve had for a minimum of the final 10 years has been the assemble of dis- and misinformation. My problem is not the dis- and misinformation assemble. It is the overuse of it.
Disinformation and misinformation are issues. They’ve which means. However they imply one thing that’s true and folks use it for issues that aren’t true. For instance, disinformation are lies. The particular person projecting the knowledge is aware of it is a lie. They’re doing it to perform an goal. The larger drawback of disinformation is misinformation. These are people who find themselves sharing these lies, not figuring out they’re lies, or taking issues out of context like satire, et cetera, and propagating as if it had been fact. These are what these are.
However not every little thing we’ve to take care of falls into that assemble. There are two different parts to this that we’ve to be conscious of.
One is lacking data, which used to imply that the target market wasn’t knowledgeable sufficient to make an accurate choice, favorable to them or anybody else. ‘It is a tragedy that your member of the family died and you need to mourn their loss, however cease touching the physique. That is the way you’re spreading Ebola’, proper? Fairly easy, fairly easy.
Now that we’re coping with nation states with deep pockets, that is been flipped up on its head they usually’re practising lively lacking data, the place they are going to present wire companies into a rustic saying, ‘Congratulations, you should use our wire service at no cost and we’ll present you all of the stuff, and that is your largest price apart from labor. Is not that great? The catch is that you simply simply have to make use of our wire service’.
Should you suppose [contextual] tales are going to get into the press via these channels, good luck. This is not occurring within the third world. These are occurring in main international locations and locations that might shock you.
Think about one thing like, ‘Should you run this story, all our related companies which can be related via us or different means are going to tug their promoting price range from you.’ So once more, good luck speaking in regards to the story in your atmosphere. Nobody’s going to the touch it. No influencer desires a bit of it as a result of they will lose their incentive construction and their income stream. It is issues like that.
On the opposite aspect of the coin, and the larger drawback, is the rhetoric data. These are the issues that are not essentially true or false. They’re framed by your worth system, the way you view issues, what you suppose fact really is.
There are individuals on the market who will say, I believe a communist socialist type of authorities that’s extremely authoritarian is extra secure and due to this fact higher than a liberal democracy. There are individuals who consider that, and simply by saying, effectively, historical past would show you in any other case, it is not a adequate argument. It’s essential interact with these individuals at a scale that issues and be ready to win the argument.
We have seen this time once more on the counter-terrorism entrance the place we might shut down the comms of a no one, and immediately that particular person would come again with the status that was so worthwhile, and now they seem to be a terrorist thought chief as a result of the Western world thought that they had been so harmful they wanted to be shut down as an alternative of simply accepting the very fact, that possibly we should always simply interact with this man as a result of nobody’s ever heard of him and possibly we should always simply level out that he is a moron.
There are methods to take care of this, and simply because we do not like one thing does not imply it is a deceive the individual that’s spreading it. They could consider it. Earlier than we simply title one thing disinformation and say, effectively, it is a lie and we are able to ignore it — that isn’t sufficient within the trendy period the place everyone seems to be related as a result of, once more, this particular person has connective tissue to the web. They’ve net platforms. They are often simply as related as a authorities if they need to select to be and if they’ve the recognition, as a result of at its core, no matter whether or not or not you are a authorities or a star or anything, you’re preventing for consideration.
Kelly: It’s typically tough for busy People to navigate the knowledge area in the present day and know what to consider with out inviting some critical time into the supply. Do you take a look at a part of your mission on this position as serving to individuals perceive extra of the context they want as a way to make good choices?
Chenoweth: I have been extra on the aspect coping with overseas audiences. However even in that regard, I believe that it actually issues to ask what are the issues that we all know to be what we really feel are goal truths and issues that matter? Issues that we would like goal audiences to know as a result of we all know it might be higher for them and higher for our targets?
After which what are the issues the place we simply wish to be sure that if a debate must be had, we facilitate the talk in order that the target market, significantly with an American target market – which once more, it is not my forte, we do not try this in authorities or should not — that must be facilitated by People mentioning to one another that we do must have these debates and are available to sort of consensus, understanding that there will likely be disagreements.
Kelly: Do you suppose your job goes to be much more necessary sooner or later or possibly much less?
Chenoweth: I’ve by no means thought the job wasn’t necessary. I believe the factor I am having fun with proper now could be that everybody’s sort of getting their head round what this implies. The overused expression that ‘We have to do some issues on Fb,’ if you would have policymakers say, ‘Nicely, I am involved that that might destroy Amazon and web commerce’ and your head would explode as you are making an attempt to elucidate, ‘That is simply not how the web works, man.’
We may be snug working on these platforms and doing issues that we have to do with out destroying web commerce or the web. And now I believe quite a lot of coverage makers and business are all related. They’re much more snug doing these items. Now could be the time when we have to get to the place the sources and the permissions actually match the power to get us the place we have to be.
I’ve typically not discovered too many authority issues. I typically discover permissions issues. I discover that with regards to authorities, you virtually all the time discover that each group really has a framework that enables them to do issues. It is simply that somebody someplace within the chain can say no and is all too snug saying no, as a result of, significantly prior to now administration, they had been very snug at avoiding threat and never as snug at managing threat. And that could be a dynamic that we’ve to alter. The world is a dangerous place, and we have to be on the market taking part in it, throwing our elbows round and managing the danger, not avoiding it.
Kelly: How exhausting of a job is it to offer the U.S. the cognitive benefit in in the present day’s world?
Chenoweth: It is exhausting, tremendously exhausting since you’re speaking about altering tradition. I do not suppose the exercise itself and the coverage and the issues that may be accomplished are exhausting. I believe the exhausting half will likely be altering the tradition and altering individuals’s mindsets.
We have talked about the truth that there was three domains: bodily area, data area and cognitive area. We now have to discover the knowledge area and really name it what it’s. There’s the bodily area, the geophysical area. However I just like the ‘kill net’ strategy. An excellent kill net will represent a kill chain that’s disrupted, and we’ve to get out of only a kill chain. We have to get right into a kill net mentality with regards to cognitive results.
Kelly: Clarify what you imply by a “kill net”?
Chenoweth: You might have your geophysical world the place issues exist in the true world, the place the place all of us stay. In relation to the knowledge area, although, it used to consolidate a bunch of issues.
The truth is that once we break that down right into a kill net, you are trying out of your bodily area as much as your logic layer. The web is just not some amorphous cloud that wanders round. It is composed of a system of techniques that stay in the true world. It is information facilities, servers, modems, et cetera. The place does that infrastructure really exist? Generally the information are within the laptop. So, we have to be conscious of the place does that work? How does the web, how do these buildings work, the cell networks, et cetera.
From there, it then creates the digital layer, the place all of the trons are that exist. You possibly can have results, that is the place your actual our on-line world comes into play. That is how the cell gadgets work, however that’s simply information.
Then it goes as much as the persona entity degree. These are the true human beings, typically pretend human beings, they’re personas, organizations however entities that probably may very well be focused or addressed or engaged, et cetera.
After which there’s the cognitive area. The trick within the cognitive area is what occurs within the thoughts. And that thoughts is influenced by the sensing that goes up via that chain once they course of it. You are in a position to interdict on its means up or affect, and also you’re in a position to affect on the way in which down when a choice is made.
For instance, when one thing occurs in the true world, it is communicated to a choice maker, however it is going to undergo the logic layer transmitted via sensors, computer systems, emails, telephones, et cetera, to individuals and entities who’re going to course of it themselves, talk it to a choice maker who’s going to decide primarily based off that data, or a person or a bunch of people.
They’re all going to make choices on how you can react to that or not react to that. And that is going to return all the way down to the bodily world once they say, ‘I do not actually like what is going on’, or possibly ‘I do like what’s occurring. Let’s do the factor’. They are going to talk that all the way down to ‘Sure, launch the missiles’, or ‘Let’s have a protest’. So, you may have an effect on the chain up. You possibly can have an effect on the chain down, however that is the way it works.
We as the US have a pipe that exists inside that kill net construction – so does everybody else. And it would not matter when you’re a nation state or a household or a person. You might have your sensing sources.
As I discussed earlier, the direct conversations between individuals in the true world – even now, you and I are speaking fully over that complete construction – and that construction may very well be affected on the way in which up as we’re speaking to when that is lastly produced and goes again out to the true world the place immediately I’ve AI results on me and I am saying issues I by no means meant to say, however the remainder of the world’s now decoding that.
I did not say that, that wasn’t my cognitive choice, however you intercepted on the way in which down and now you’d inadvertently have an effect on everybody else’s cognitive strategy to what I am speaking.
Kelly: What does the longer term from a know-how and AI standpoint actually appear like?
Chenoweth: It is having basic adjustments. It should be attention-grabbing to see what occurs within the leisure business as AI takes over and immediately individuals can have extra entry. We have seen how the music business went via enormous change simply on streaming music. We’re about to witness what that is going to appear like from our extra conventional platforms. We have seen how issues transfer from streaming. I believe there’s a degree of adaptation that is going to go along with that.
One of many issues that must be addressed is how precisely we’ll interact. There’s a level the place we have to be snug with giving type of steering to the AIs – human within the loop – however when you suppose that you are going to have the ability to assessment each single message that should exit in an AI-driven world, you are out of your thoughts.
So, you want to have the ability to be snug producing on your target market profiles and provides type of thematic steering and let the AI do some degree of engagements towards overseas audiences to steer conversations in a specific path, or a minimum of determine the place a dialog could be going so you may intervene when it appears like choices are being made in a nasty means, after which discover out if that’s an open and sincere cultural nuance factor the place it’s about engagement or if it is being steered by your opponent.
I believe that we’re not far, and we’re in all probability already in a sport, the place there are AIs versus AIs as we communicate within the data atmosphere.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.