One of many central contradictions behind the Fox media empire was identified by Lisa Simpson within the 2007 “Simpsons” episode “You Kent At all times Say What You Need.” She asks, “One factor I’ve at all times puzzled: how can Fox Information be so conservative when the Fox community retains airing raunchy reveals? They do not match collectively.”
Exchange “raunchy” with “liberal” and you have got the extra fascinating query. Fox reveals like “The Simpsons” and “Household Man” are largely written by folks with liberal sensibilities, whereas the Fox Information facet of the corporate has at all times been closely right-wing, instructing its viewers to worry and hate liberals and to by no means belief any information community outdoors of its personal.
The contradiction works each methods: for the “Simpsons” writers, how do they make peace with serving to such a conservative community generate income? That is one thing that “Household Man” creator Seth MacFarlane has publicly struggled with; he tweeted in 2021 that he wished “Household Man” did not should air on the Fox community. For each “Household Man” and “The Simpsons,” their means of dealing with their unavoidable complicity with the worst information community on this planet is to make enjoyable of Fox as a lot as potential and dare the community to do one thing about it.
The “Simpsons” joke that almost broke the camel’s again was season 14’s “Mr. Spritz Goes to Washington,” the place the Simpson household tries to get the lonely Krusty the Clown elected to Congress with a view to cease airplanes from flying proper over their home. Krusty runs as a Republican, and his marketing campaign is boosted by a debate he takes half in that is hosted by Fox Information. Not solely is the talk moderator clearly within the tank for Krusty, however there’s additionally a rolling information ticker on the underside of the display with nonstop headlines like “Examine: 92% of Democrats are Homosexual,” “Oil Slicks Discovered to Maintain Seals Younger, Supple,” and “Do Democrats Trigger Most cancers?”
In an interview not lengthy after with the Nationwide Public Radio (by way of Unbiased), “The Simpsons” creator Matt Groening defined, “Fox stated they’d sue the present. And we referred to as their bluff as a result of we did not assume Rupert Murdoch would pay for Fox to sue itself. We obtained away with it.” He later added, “However now Fox has a brand new rule that we won’t do these little pretend information crawls on the underside of the display in a cartoon as a result of it’d confuse the viewers into considering it is actual information.”
Fox and The Simpsons have an advanced relationship
Fox Information itself denied any such claims of it attempting to sue. “We’re scratching our heads over right here. We appreciated the cartoon. We thought it was nice,” claimed Robert Zimmerman, a Fox Information spokesman (by way of The Guardian).
It is onerous to consider him although, as a result of as “The Simpsons” has made clear through the years, Fox Information cannot be trusted. “Do you know that each day Mexican gays sneak into this nation and unplug our brain-dead girls?” Homer says in “You Kent At all times Say What You Need” after watching means an excessive amount of of the community. That episode additionally ends with Homer telling Lisa he is found a horrible reality in regards to the Fox community, just for a Fox announcer to begin dubbing over his dialogue.
Whether or not Fox Information really did attempt to sue the present, or if it was solely making an empty menace in an try to dissuade the “Simpsons” writers from any extra jabs of this kind, it appears clear that in public Fox’s technique is to behave like none of this bothers it. And hey, perhaps it actually does not; the mere reality “The Simpsons” was owned by Fox — nicely, at the very least till the Disney acquisition — undermined any type of chew its Fox jokes might need. You may make enjoyable of Fox Information all you need, however on the finish of the day in the event you’re taking its cash and giving it earnings in return, are you actually preventing the ability?
It is a dilemma that plenty of reveals battle with, just like the Amazon-owned “The Boys,” which spends most of its time bashing firms for ruining the world. Followers usually level out the irony of a present owned by Jeff Bezos attempting to place itself as an anti-corporation sequence, however then once more, what precisely is the present alleged to do about this? If Amazon Studios hadn’t picked the present up after over eight years in growth hell, the “Boys” TV sequence doubtless would not exist in any respect.
Should you’re arguing that solely TV reveals and movies that are not financially related to evil mega-corporations ought to be capable to critique them, you then’re primarily arguing that almost all critiques of evil mega-corporations ought to be worn out of mainstream leisure. “The Simpsons” and its decades-long ribbing of Fox Information would’ve had much more edge to it if it’d been owned by anybody else, certain, but it surely’s nonetheless higher than not making enjoyable of Fox in any respect.